Welcome to your 15.07.2026
Statement I:Section 356 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) enables a court to conduct a complete criminal trial in the absence of the accused, provided the accused is a proclaimed offender who has absconded to evade trial and there is no immediate prospect of arrest.
Statement II:The recent move by the National Investigation Agency (NIA) to seek trial in absentia against Hafiz Saeed under Section 356 of the BNSS reflects the use of this provision in cases involving proclaimed offenders accused of grave offences with no realistic prospect of securing their presence before an Indian court.
Statement III:The introduction of trial in absentia under the BNSS dispenses with procedural safeguards such as notice, legal representation, and opportunity to appear, in order to ensure speedy disposal of criminal cases.
Which of the following relationships among the above statements is/are correct?
Options:
III. Attempts by a single country to levy unilateral transit charges on international shipping through this passage have raised questions regarding legality, freedom of navigation and customary international law.
The above statements have been associated with which of the following?
Select the answer using the code given below:
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Please fill in the comment box below.
Time's up
Time is Up!