Welcome to your 23.07.2026
Statement I:
Restrictions on internet access imposed by the State must satisfy the constitutional test of legality, necessity and proportionality, since the exercise of fundamental rights through the internet is constitutionally protected.
Statement II:
The Supreme Court, in Anuradha Bhasin v. Union of India (2020), held that indefinite suspension of internet services is impermissible and that such orders must be reasoned, published and subject to periodic review.
Statement III:
Once a government invokes public order or national security as the ground for suspending internet services, judicial scrutiny of the necessity and proportionality of the restriction is excluded.
Which of the following relationships among the above statements is/are correct?
Options:
The above statements have been associated with which of the following?
Select the answer using the code given below:
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Please fill in the comment box below.
Time's up
Time is Up!